┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  RECORD TYPE ......... ANNOTATION — SOURCED RECORD
  REGISTRY NO. ........ MARG-0854
  SLUG ................ /cia-review-news-pre-publication
  STATUS .............. ACTIVE
  FILED ............... 2026-06-25 20:46 UTC
  LAST ANNOTATED ...... 2026-06-25 20:46 UTC
  CLAIMS ON FILE ...... 6
  MEAN TAG CONFIDENCE . 0.90
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
PENDING

CIA Review of News Stories Prior to Publication in U.S. Media

The question of whether the CIA reviews or vets news stories prior to publication in major U.S. media outlets is a contested narrative. Official declassification programs exist for government records, including those from the CIA, making historical documents available to the public after review processes [2, 4, 6]. However, these processes relate to the release of classified information from government archives, not journalistic content prior to its dissemination. Some claims, particularly from online forums, allege that CIA press handlers have received story drafts from reporters before publication [10]. This claim typically points to specific instances, which proponents argue indicate a broader pattern of pre-publication vetting. Official guidance from the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) addresses prepublication reviews for non-official material by intelligence community employees, primarily focusing on classified information and non-disclosure agreements, but this applies to former intelligence personnel publishing their own works, not external journalists [5, 8, 11]. The existence of a formal or informal program for CIA pre-vetting of general news stories in major U.S. media remains a point of contention and further investigation.

The strongest argument for CIA pre-publication review stems from reported instances where journalists allegedly submitted story drafts to CIA press handlers prior to publication. These incidents, as highlighted in some forum discussions, suggest a mechanism for the CIA to influence or vet news content before it reaches the public. While official prepublication review guidelines apply to former intelligence community members, the existence of such interactions with journalists indicates a potential informal or ad-hoc process for the intelligence community to review media content. This could be motivated by national security concerns or an effort to manage public perception of intelligence activities.

The strongest argument against a systematic CIA pre-publication review process for U.S. media outlets is that official guidelines and declassified records primarily address the review of *government* documents for declassification, or the prepublication review of *non-official material by intelligence community employees* to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of classified information [2, 4, 8]. There are no verified declassified records or official admissions indicating a formal CIA program to vet general news stories from independent journalists before publication in U.S. media. Claims of such vetting often rely on single-source reports or interpretations of interactions between journalists and intelligence public affairs offices, which could be routine journalistic fact-checking or information-gathering rather than a vetting process.

  1. DISPUTEDCONF 0.80

    Declassified records indicate a formal CIA program or process to review news stories prior to publication in major U.S. media outlets.

    — attributed to: Online forums and some media criticism discussions [10]

  2. VERIFIEDCONF 1.00

    The CIA has official programs for the historical review and declassification of its own documents.

    — attributed to: CIA Historical Review Program

    • https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/historical-collections
    • https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/crest-25-year-program-archive
  3. VERIFIEDCONF 1.00

    Employees of the U.S. intelligence community are generally required to sign nondisclosure agreements as a condition of access to classified information.

    — attributed to: Columbia Law Review

    • https://columbialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Casey-Kevin.pdf?inline=1
  4. VERIFIEDCONF 1.00

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) issues directives on prepublication reviews for non-official material produced by intelligence community employees.

    — attributed to: Office of the Director of National Intelligence

    • https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD-711-Prepublication-Reviews.pdf
  5. SINGLE-SOURCECONF 0.70

    Journalist Ken Dilanian (formerly of LA Times, now NBC) routinely submitted story drafts and summaries to CIA press handlers prior to publication.

    — attributed to: A 2014 Reddit post citing a FOIA request

    • https://www.reddit.com/r/media_criticism/comments/unevp0/the_cias_mopup_man_la_times_reporter_cleared/
  6. CORROBORATEDCONF 0.90

    Former CIA officers have stated that the CIA blocked the publication of their books, labeling them 'fully classified' until permission was granted.

    — attributed to: Ex-CIA officers Andrew Bustamante and Jihi Bustamante

    • https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1nit288/we_are_excia_officers_andrew_bustamante_and_jihi/
  • 1987Records through 1987 were eligible for automatic declassification by December 31, 2012, under the CREST 25-year program. [src]
  • 2014A FOIA request allegedly showed journalist Ken Dilanian submitted story drafts to CIA press handlers. [src]
  • 2022Former CIA officers' book was labeled 'fully classified' by the CIA, blocking publication. [src]
  • 2024-07-12The Office of the Director of National Intelligence received queries regarding the definition of 'fully-informed person' in its directive on prepublication reviews. [src]
  • ORG CIAIntelligence agency, subject of claims
  • ORG Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)Issues guidelines for intelligence community employees
  • PERSON Ken DilanianJournalist alleged to have submitted stories for review
  • ORG LA TimesMedia outlet where journalist Ken Dilanian worked
  • PERSON Andrew BustamanteFormer CIA officer whose book was subject to review
  • PERSON Jihi BustamanteFormer CIA officer whose book was subject to review
  • Are there any declassified CIA internal communications or policy documents that explicitly outline procedures for reviewing news stories from external U.S. media outlets before publication?
  • Can the FOIA request cited in the Reddit post regarding Ken Dilanian be independently verified and retrieved, and what specific documents did it contain?
  • What is the official CIA or ODNI stance on interactions between intelligence agency press handlers and journalists regarding story content prior to publication?
  • Are there other documented instances, beyond the Ken Dilanian example, where major U.S. journalists are credibly alleged to have submitted story drafts to the CIA for review?
  • How do the ODNI prepublication review guidelines for intelligence community employees publishing non-official material compare to any alleged practices of reviewing independent journalistic content?
  1. [WEB] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/historical-collections
    The Historical Review Program coordinates the review of the documents with CIA components and other US Government entities before final declassification action is taken and the documents are transferred to the National Archives. Our Historical Collections are listed below. For mo
  2. [WEB] https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/crest-25-year-program-archive [archived]
    The requirement to automatically declassify records 25 years or older "rolls" forward one year at a time. For example, by 31 December 2012, permanent records through 31 December 1987 were automatically declassified, unless appropriately exempted under the guidelines of the EO. In
  3. [WEB] https://columbialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Casey-Kevin.pdf?inline=1
    As a condition of access to classified information, most employees of the U.S. intelligence community are required to sign nondisclosure.
  4. [WEB] https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/ [archived]
    The Digital National Security Archive (DNSA) is an invaluable online collection of more than 100,000 declassified records documenting historic U.S. policy decisions. Read the documents that shaped U.S. responses to the Cold War, the terrorist attacks of 9/11, nuclear weapons prol
  5. [WEB] https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/96785.pdf [archived]
    The Foreign Relations of the United States series presents the official documentary historical record of major foreign policy decisions and.
  6. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/j827uz/i_joined_the_cia_as_a_22yearold_girl_right_after/
    9 Oct 2020 · So many questions pop up... Can you login to the CIA's servers and look into records of any human being? Do you guys have like a secret ...
  7. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/media_criticism/comments/unevp0/the_cias_mopup_man_la_times_reporter_cleared/ [archived]
    Media Being Criticized: LA Times The Criticism: A FOIA request shows how Ken Dilanian (formerly) at the LA Times (now at NBC) routinely submitted story drafts and detailed summaries of his stories to CIA press handlers prior to publication,to the CIA for review.
  8. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1nit288/we_are_excia_officers_andrew_bustamante_and_jihi/
    16 Sept 2025 · CIA spent 3 years blocking publication of our book. They labeled it 'fully classified' in 2022. We ultimately got permission to publish only ...
  9. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/communism101/comments/oulmjn/why_does_the_cia_declassify_documents/ [archived]
    " The automatic declassification process increases the potential release of formerly classified national security information to the general public and researchers, enhancing their knowledge of the United States' democratic institutions and history, while at the same time ensurin
  10. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/181s71r/the_cias_experiments_with_remote_viewing_and/ [archived]
    23 Nov 2023 · The CIAs experiments with remote viewing and specifically their continued experimentation with Ingo Swann can provide some evidence toward “non-local ...
  11. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/7m2rcs/merry_christmas_iama_former_cia_operative_douglas/ [archived]
    25 Dec 2017 · ... CIA life and was just waiting for agency review before publication. That was four years ago. The intensity and rehearsed nature of the ...
  12. [WEB] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-109hhrg29385/html/CHRG-109hhrg29385.htm [archived]
    [House Hearing, 109 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] DROWNING IN A SEA OF FAUX SECRETS: POLICIES ON HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED AND ...
  13. [WEB] https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-Evidence-Obama-Subvert-President-Trump-2016-Victory-Election-July2025.pdf [archived]
    17 Jul 2025 · questioning of the cybersecurity of the upcoming US election, based on numerous news and editorial reports in major media outlets globally since ...
  14. [WEB] https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD-711-Prepublication-Reviews.pdf [archived]
    Reviews. on 12 July 2024 (Reference). the Office of the Director of National Intelligence received queries on the definition of the .. fully-informed person·· standard in section C.3. That section provides that ··[t]his Directive applies to non-official material that a fully-info
  15. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnAmerican/comments/n5fzs1/how_do_you_read_cia_declassified_reports/ [archived]
    How do you read CIA declassified reports You often hear about them in news, in US history textbooks, and to me they are very mysterious. I want to know more about CIA declassified reports. Is there a way to read them? Do folks from CIA keep a running blog and update something onc
  16. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/ihm44f/how_trustworthy_are_declassified_documents_do/ [archived]
    Are declassified documents (from agencies such as CIA and KGB) seen as trustworthy by history experts? My question includes both documents related to internal affairs (e.g. reports on the US by American agencies) and external intelligence (e.g. CIA reports on the Ussr, Iran, etc.